Evaluation criteria

Evaluation criteria:

1. The content - 35% (lists of sites that were used with description)
• Lots of interesting author's materials, original formulation of a problem and its solution: 35-25%
• A rather interesting problem but not fully expressed, little percentage of independence in its solution: 24-25%
• Not enough amount of manuscript, a very superficial expression of the topic, elements of plagiarism: 14-0%
Your score: ___

2. Material arrangement , easiness of navigation : 10%
• Logic material arrangement, easiness of navigation: 10-8%
• Navigation is quite easy but the logic of material arrangement is disturbed: 7-5%
• Absence of logic in the material arrangement, navigation is complicated: 4-0%
Your score: ___

3. Language– 30% (grammar, spelling, style)
• Almost no mistakes (1 grammatical mistake – 1%; 1 stylistic mistake – 1%; 1 spelling mistake– 0,5%)
• Some mistakes (1 grammatical mistake – 1%; 1 stylistic mistake – 1%; 1 spelling mistake– 0,5%)
• Lots of mistakes (1 grammatical mistake – 1%; 1 stylistic mistake – 1%; 1 spelling mistake– 0,5%)
Your score: ___

4. Design – 10% (colour, graphics, images, other effects)
• Design doesn't distract from the content, the general style is preserved: 10%
• Quite acceptable but for some inaccuracies: 9-6%
• The perception is complicated, too many colours and graphic items – design distracts from the content: 5-0%
Your score: ___

5. Webliography – 10% (about 20 links with annotations)
• about 20 links with annotations 10-8%
• less than 10 links with annotations 7-4%
• less than 6 links 4-0%
Your score: ___

6. Authorship – 5% (adequate information about authors)
• Adequate information with annotations and email address: 5%
• Quite adequate information, no email address: 4-3%
•Just personal information without any links for the site of the faculty: 0%
Your score: ___

Total score: ___